Why do psychology students believe in neuromyths? A study of personality, contextual and cognitive predictors

Abstract

Background: Neuromyths—misconceptions arising from misinterpretations of neuroscientific findings—are widely endorsed by educators and students, including those in psychology. Their persistence has been linked to contextual, cognitive, and personality-related factors, but evidence is mixed, especially among psychology students. This study examined predictors of neuromyth endorsement in Argentine psychology undergraduates. Objective: To identify contextual (neuroscience training, interest), personality (Need for Cognition; NFC), and cognitive (Cognitive Reflection Test; CRT) predictors of neuromyth beliefs. Methods: A convenience sample of 320 psychology students (82.5% women; M_age = 27.39 years) completed online measures assessing neuromyth endorsement, general brain knowledge, NFC, CRT, and self-reported neuroscience training and interest. Spearman correlations and hierarchical regressions were conducted to examine associations and predictive effects. Results: Participants endorsed 41.22% of neuromyths on average, with learning styles (76.25%) and sensory-rich environments benefits (74.37%) being the most accepted. CRT scores negatively predicted neuromyth endorsement (β = 􀀀 .175, p < .001), whereas the NFC “enjoyment of thinking” factor positively predicted endorsement (β = 0.145, p = .024). Age also showed a positive effect (β = 0.175, p = .002). Neuroscience interest, courses taken, and general brain knowledge did not predict neuromyth acceptance, although they were positively associated with neuroscience knowledge. Conclusions: Analytical thinking emerged as the strongest protective factor against neuromyths, while enjoyment of thinking unexpectedly predicted higher endorsement, possibly reflecting exposure to low-quality sources of information and/or Dunning-Kruger effects. Factual neuroscience knowledge and training did not decrease neuromyth endorsement, underscoring the importance of fostering critical thinking skills within psychology education.