https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/9623 2026-04-15T03:37:13Z 2026-04-15T03:37:13Z https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/9669 2021-06-28T14:01:51Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: Sapientia, 2018, Vol. LXXIV, n° 243 (número completo)

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Furlan, Timothy J. https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/9667 2020-11-03T14:29:44Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: Sobre la explicación teleológica en Aristóteles; Aristotle on teleological explanation Autor: Furlan, Timothy J. Resumen: Resumen: En un conocido pasaje al comienzo de EN I. 7 Aristóteles concluye que la eudaimonia debe ser ese bien supremo (to ariston) hacia el cual apuntan todas nuestras acciones. A pesar de que, según él, esta conclusión es generalmente acordada (en otras palabras, explicada por las opiniones de muchos y sabios), sin embargo se requiere una explicación más explícita. En los primeros trabajos sobre De Motu Animalium de Aristóteles Martha Nussbaum expresa su desconcierto sobre este pasaje y hace una sugerencia fascinante y provocativa, a saber, que el uso de la argumentación de funciones en Aristóteles difiere aquí de su despliegue habitual en sus trabajos biológicos y zoológicos.; Abstract: In a well-known passage at the beginning of NE I. 7 Aristotle concludes that eudaimonia must be that supreme good (to ariston) toward which all our actions aim. Although, he admits, this conclusion is generally agreed upon —it is, in other words, accounted for by the opinions of the many and the wise1— nevertheless a more explicit account is required. In her early work on Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium, Martha Nussbaum expresses puzzlement about this passage and makes a fascinating and provocative suggestion, namely, that Aristotle’s use of function argumentation here differs from its usual deployment throughout his biological and zoological works.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Velarde Mayol, Víctor https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/9665 2020-04-09T04:20:34Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: Intencionalidad e inmaterialidad en Santo Tomás de Aquino; Intentionality and Immateriality in Thomas Aquinas Autor: Velarde Mayol, Víctor Resumen: Resumen: Se argumenta a favor de la tesis tomista de que la esencia del conocimiento es la inmaterialidad, en contra de un gran sector del tomismo contemporáneo que prefiere radicar la esencia del conocimiento en la intencionalidad. Hay dos partes en este ensayo: una histórica y la otra sistemática. La parte histórica es un intento de identificar el origen del lenguaje intencionalista en el tomismo contemporáneo. A continuación, la parte sistemática, donde se argumenta que el concepto tomista de intencionalidad no solo no coincide con el moderno, sino que está relegado a un segundo plano en relación a la noción de inmaterialidad. Varias razones se dan para ello, primero, porque el conocimiento por intencionalidad es simplemente un tipo de conocimiento, no todo conocimiento es por intencionalidad, y además es un conocimiento imperfecto; segundo, porque la intencionalidad es un efecto causal; tercero, porque la intencionalidad no es una propiedad del acto de conocimiento, sino de la forma.; Abstract: Several arguments are provided to defend the Thomistic thesis that the essence of knowledge consists in immateriality, against a large sector of contemporary Thomism that prefers to view that the essence of knowledge consists in intentionality. There are two parts to this essay: one historical and the other systematic. The historical part is an attempt to identify the origin of the intentionalist language in contemporary Thomism. It is followed by the systematic part, where it is argued that the Thomistic concept of intentionality not only does not coincide with the modern one, but is relegated to the background in relation to the notion of immateriality. Several reasons are given for this, first, because knowledge by intentionality is simply a type of knowledge, not all knowledge is by intentionality, and, in addition to this, is an imperfect knowledge; second because intentionality is a causal effect; third, because intentionality is not a property of the act of knowledge, but of the form.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Bracchi, Marco https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/handle/123456789/9664 2020-04-14T04:24:26Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: Rileggendo la Summa Theologica di san Tommaso d’Aquino : Il trattato De Deo a partire dalla teologia di Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange Autor: Bracchi, Marco Resumen: Riassunto: Ripercorrendo le questioni dalla 2 alla 26 della Prima Pars della Summa Theologica di san Tommaso d’Aquino, l’articolo si propone di mostrare l’unità interna al trattato de Deo grazie alla rilettura offerta da padre Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange (1877-1964). La tesi dell’eminentia Deitatis si dimostra la chiave di volta del procedimento di rilettura del processo teologico avviato dall’Aquinate, cosicché per ogni analisi puntuale emerge un rimando all’integrità della visione su Dio e sulla sua vita intima. Conoscere meglio l’Essere che è Dio e il suo stesso agire, significa comprendere meglio l’uomo e il suo fine ultimo: la visio beatifica. Ecco perché la nominazione di Dio non è una problematica secondaria nella teologia cattolica: non siamo figli di un Dio senza Volto e senza Nome. E la prospettiva di Garrigou-Lagrange è guida fondamentale per leggere l’Aquinate in questa direzione. L’articolo auspica una nuova rinascita della trattazione su Dio nel senso classico del termine e della ripresa dei commenti alla Summa Theologica.; Abstract: This article is intended to analyse the internal unity in the treatise de Deo thanks to the interpretation offered by Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange (1877-1964) re-examining the questions from 2 to 26 of Summa Theologica’s Prima Pars by Saint Thomas Aquinas. The eminentia Deitatis thesis represents the keystone of the theological process’s reviewing started by Aquinas, so it arises a reference to the integrity of God’s interpretation and of his intimate life for a precise analysis. To know better the Being that is God and his act, means to understand better man and his last aim: the visio beatifica. That is why the nomination of God is not a secondary issue in the Catholic theology: we are not children of a God who has not a Face and a Name. Garrigou-Lagrange’s perspective is a fundamental guide to read Aquinas in this direction. The article hopes for a «rebirth» of God’s discussion from a classical point of view and a new analysis of Summa Theologica.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z